SuperSatellite ||

If you have been following my tweets lately, you might have noticed that I’ve been fighting over which service I would prefer to use: Flickr or Picasa. This has resulted in far more headache than I would have initially thought, and I still don’t feel any closer to coming up with an answer. I thought by sharing my opinions, maybe you could toss some feedback my way that might help the decision making process. You may also ridicule and taunt me, as it pleases you.

I am not a photographer. I enjoy taking pictures, and I believe that I take relatively good ones, given my amateurish state. But I admit that it’s just a small hobby. Until now, I have used a Coppermine powered gallery that I kept on my personal server for managing and sharing my pictures. This works relatively well. To be perfectly honest, the only real reason I even care to switch is because I’d like to connect to more social tools through my photos. My own hidden little gallery site doesn’t do that. I also don’t have a lot of interest in keeping the software maintained, so I end up with older software that is a pain in the butt to update. But, I’m also not looking for 100,000 people to drool over my pictures. Mostly it’ll be stuff from plays I work on, or trips I take, things none of you care about (even though you try to act interested).

And here’s the matchup. Flickr is clearly a more socially driven web site. It’s purpose is more closely linked with my goal, I think. But, they lack a good desktop app for organizing pictures like Picasa does. They have an uploader application, which seems to work well enough, but I’d like my offline archive to basically mirror what I have online (at the moment, my photos folder is a pretty big mess, I admit it). Flickr is also pretty crippled if you don’t spend $24.95 a year on a pro account. Without it, you only get to use three sets (albums), which is, frankly, useless to me. You also only get to upload 100MB of photos a month, which if you are trying to migrate to their service, is also pretty useless. I said I’m not a photographer, but I still have a solid 2GB+ of photo (not that I need to share them all, but if I can, I probably will share most). However, with pro, you get unlimited everything for the most part. Storage, bandwidth, sets, collections, even video (if you care. I don’t).

Picasa has a slightly different purpose. It is geared more towards what Coppermine did for me; simply provide online gallery/album functionality. It’s desktop app is nice for organizing offline, and it integrates right into web albums. You get unlimited albums out of the gates, and a full gig of storage with no upload limits per month. But, extra storage (10GB) starts at $20/yr. Cheaper than Flickr Pro, but Flickr Pro gives you unlimited storage for five bucks more. Alternatively, you can do more for free through Picasa, just at a loss to some of the social networking features Flickr has. If you need more than 10GB, the price starts hurting.

My problem is basically that I can’t easily decide what kind of user I am, or what my goal is. I fall right in the middle of one big gray area, like Nick-at-Nite TVLand poop. Ideally, the systems should just merge into one super warehouse, like my crappy Photoshopped graphic above intimates. $25 a year isn’t much, but a lot of what I’d pay for I could have through Picasa for free. And using Flickr leaves me stuck managing stuff offline through something else. I could use Picasa as a purely offline file manager, but that’s like using it and wasting half the purpose of it. Half a dozen of one, six of another. I sure as hell don’t want to do both, I’d like one solution that answers my needs.

You could solve this problem for me, of course. Just sponsor a Flickr Pro account for me, and that will make up my mind for me. It’s not that I’m cheap, it’s just that I’m cheap.

Update: I almost forgot to mention; Brad Ward has a nice blog writeup on Flickr over at SquaredPeg on Flickr, and using it to manage your photos.  I read it the other day and it was really what got me thinking that Flickr might be the way to go.

You know, I thought that something sounded a little strange when Michaele called me last night and told me that she got a call that we had won a free vacation to the Bahamas. She didn’t have a lot of info, but I figured since they’d called her at work, she might not have had time to talk too long. But what info she could tell me, just sounded a little odd. I should always go with my first instinct.

Like why, if we won, did we have to make a trip to Joplin to pick up the information? Just mail it to us. And she said that if we couldn’t make it this weekend, they’d be back through in three months. What’s that you say? Why do they make rounds? I told Michaele to call them back this morning and ask a few more questions, what she found out seems to have confirmed what I thought.

The reason that we had to go to Joplin was because that was where the presentation was that we had to go to. But we shouldn’t worry, there would be other couples there too. Sounding scammy? It should. Nothing like this comes free, and there isn’t a company on the planet that’s going to be giving away bucket loads of free trips every few months. According to the lady on the phone, we just had to go, listen to a small presentation, have a snack made for us, and answer a quick survey. In reality, it’s a sales pitch for worthless, $2500 cookware. But don’t take my word for it, read this forum thread. But don’t take their word for it, go look at the info at the Consumer Affairs site. This is just another version of the time share sale.

Here’s things as I have dug them up so far. Gateway Brides claims to be the parent company. I asked them straightforward who owns them, and was told no one. This from the lady that I called and talked to (and I might have embellished a little bit and said my profession involved law during the course of conversation). Not true. Actually, they appear to be a shell front of some kind for Royal Prestige (though I can’t confirm that they actually own Gateway Brides, but they’re sure as hell affiliated). The reason I say that is because they appear to be so far removed from the operation that the agent couldn’t answer any questions, deferring to “we just notify the people that they were selected. The presenters can answer your concerns.” Tax value of the trip? No clue. The names of the presenters? Unknown. Will they have a license on file for the drawing? Maybe. Is there any information online she could refer me to? No (a lie).

Bottom line, I should go to the presentation to get my answers. Right, how about no. Though to her credit, she sounded plenty nice, and thoroughly nervous after learning my “profession.” In reality, it appears that the trips are actually real. Even though she didn’t know of a website I could visit, there actually is a Gateway Brides site (or, depending on your locations, duplicate sites like RP Northeast, Inc. which clearly have the exact same origin). A domain that is clearly a direct marketing firm site, but one that also pointed me to V.I.P. Vacations NY. These people are essentially a vacation clearing house that deals cheap vacations to companies that then use them as an incentive. So, in theory, the trips are real. At least they were in 1985, when it looks like the picture above was taken of their president, one Vince Dima. At this point, visions of scenes from Glengarry GlenRoss are dancing in my head. Research on him reveals he’s bought a number of businesses, none of which are really related, like an ISP reseller and an insurance company. Here’s some other info, which seems to indicate that everything is pretty connected to him at the top.

YourNetPlus was originally founded in 1995, and was acquired and incorporated by President and CEO Vince Dima in 2000. Dima’s company, the 21st Century Group, owns a number of other businesses including a $30 million bridal registry business and a national vacation premium business. Taking over YourNetPlus, Dima says, was a way for his company to become involved in the Internet.

Continuing the trail, V.I.P. Vacations NY is connected to the Viva Resorts group. They own a number of resorts in the Dominican Republic and the Bahamas. They aren’t four or five star resorts as was told to us. In fact, the one in the Bahamas scores a poorly represented three stars. As I interpreted it, that particular review was a touch on the side of being a warning to stay away. Roving bees? Unkempt grounds? Exposed wiring? Is this somewhere you’d want to spend a honeymoon? And other info indicates that you might get hit with resort taxes, transportation fees, and surcharges during peak season.

These folks are clever, I’ll give them that. Each dangly appendage of the business seems to maintain an air of plausible deniability about them, and the interconnectedness seems to be set up that if you successfully deal through one part, another one is ready to pick up the loose ends. The presentation at 7:30PM runs about two hours (longer than they say by about double). By the time you’re done, you’re tired and just want to leave and are more susceptible to pressure. They also target engaged couples with the incentive of a “free honeymoon” and use scare tactics to make you afraid that you’ll be killing your future family with your pots and pans. You know what, if my pans will kill my family, at least they’ll die by cast iron deliciousness.

But, what to do? The cynical side of me says to go, and just use my sharp wit and stubbornness to ensure that we leave one free trip heavier, and nothing else. But that same side also says that they clearly know how to deal with people like me, since they have yet to be sued out of existence. I figure they either successfully con stupid people, or they get someone like me chasing my tail trying to beat them for the trip. Regardless, when the dust settles, they’re gone and not out anything for their trouble. I say that, because I can’t actually find a single firm case of someone actually getting the trip. While they might give you the voucher, I suspect they tack on hidden fees (besides paying for your own flight) and try to blackout date you to hell and back until the three year window is up.

So, be informed, and don’t buy in to it for a minute. Know what you’re getting into, and always remember free things seldom are.

Well, I think I know what my next big purchase is going to be. A motorcycle. And I swear it’s not some macho guy thing (c’mon, me, macho? I barely pull off meek and unintimidating). I’ve been playing with the idea for a while actually, and I figure with gas breaching $3.50 a gallon, an 80MPG 250cc bike is sure becoming awfully appealing. And I’m not talking a Harley. They are too big and too expensive. I need a Diet Coke type motorcycle.

Consider, let’s just assume I buy a new bike, rather than used. Drop a grand down, make $90/month payment (realistically a small bike I can pay off in a year). The amount I’m saving in gas would actually be paying for the bike. Compare: V8 Lincoln LS - 17MPG in town against a Yamaha V Star 250 - 80MPG. We’re not talking a minor little difference here. This is about a 5 fold increase in fuel economy. And a bike with a little 250cc engine isn’t going to let me get into any trouble. It’s not racy, it’s light, it’s easy to handle. Good starter bike for a guy who has never ridden a motorcycle before (my two wheels are normally pedal powered). Plus 250’s apparently hold their value well, because of the fuel economy and the fact that there are always new people looking for starter bikes.

I’m really just trying to decide on what I want. Honda and Yamaha have tempting bikes at this size, the Rebel and the V Star 250. And they’re nice looking bikes too. Small, but they don’t look like toy bikes. At least to an amateur like me. Of course, my parents will probably slap me stupid for it, but it’s not like I’m wanting some 1100cc cruiser (yet). It’s either that, or I’m riding to work this summer on the mountain bike I got at the police auction today. I’m leaning towards the V Star, since it appears to have a little bit nicer equipment all around. I’m going to see about checking one out on Monday.

Unfortunately, to get one used you really have to be in the right place at the right time. Surprisingly, Harley’s are easy to come buy in the for sale ads, but they still aren’t cheap. So, we’ll see if I get lucky. I have a way of doing that once in a while (not that way, you perv). Oddly enough, there’s a Kawasaki Vulcan Classic coming up at an auction next month, but unfortunately for me it’s way to big.

Luckily, my dad served as a lesson in how not to ride a motorcycle, when a semi pretty much nearly squashed him on the highway when he was a kid. I’m in it totally for practicality. That, and I’ll look like a total badass stud.

By now, you might have heard of the new Adobe Integrated Runtime, otherwise known as AIR. AIR is aimed at allowing developers to create rich internet applications that are capable of running on a user’s desktop, regardless of operating system. Think Java, but geared more towards self contained web applications. It also results in comparatively superior looking applications. I mean come on, anyone else think Java is generally ugly?

The Adobe® AIR™ runtime enables you to have your favorite web applications with you all the time. Since applications built for Adobe AIR run on your desktop computer without a web browser, they provide all the convenience of a desktop application. Companies like eBay and AOL are using Adobe AIR to create exciting new applications that allow you to use their services on your desktop. In short, Adobe AIR means applications that are easier, more powerful, and more fun to use.

With AIR, you can slap some XHTML and Flash together, and create an application on it that can run independent of a browser. It’s finding wide adoption among crowds like Twitter users. Groups that are looking for applications to plug into a web site’s API (Application Program Interface). Check out Twhirl for an example, it’s what I use to keep up on Twitter. So, this is all super neat, right? Applications install with little more than a couple clicks, and can auto-update themselves to boot. Nice in Windows, but this could be invaluable in the Linux world. Can you guess why?

I run Ubuntu 8.04b on my laptop (I love installing 20 updates every day!). My desktop dual boots XP/Ubuntu (it swings both ways). I’m slowly transitioning to the geek side. But, I fall far short of calling myself a Linux guru (you may still refer to me as Sir, though). I can do anything in Windows, but in Linux…well…I’m like a sixteen year old boy on prom night. Actually, I’m getting much better than that, but for years the largest barrier to entry for me has been installing software. It has gotten easier with RPM’s, apt-get, and Ubuntu’s Add/Remove Applications interface, but if something isn’t listed you might find yourself jumping through a number of hurdles to get things going. And let’s be honest, how many “average” users could master the art of ./configure, make, and make install? Easy for a geek, hard for Grandma Jane (don’t hit me grandma!).

That’s where this whole AIR thing caught my attention. Turns out, Adobe has got an alpha version of AIR for Linux released. Keep in mind, it’s only for testing and not fully functional (like your mom), though I’ve only noticed a little graphical quirkiness so far. First off, the install is fairly painless (though must be done through the command line):

user@system:~$ wget http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/air/linux/adobeair_linux_a1_033108.bin
user@system:~$ chmod +x adobeair_linux_a1_033108.bin
user@system:~$ sudo ./adobeair_linux_a1_033108.bin

The installer pretty much does it’s own thing. From there, you can now find and open up an .air file for an application that you want to try out. Sizlopedia has got a nice list of 10 good AIR applications that you can start with. That’s where the whole gap bridging takes place. It’s almost like running your basic install.exe file. The browser will ask if you want to open it with Adobe’s handler (hint: you do), and it runs and installs like a Window’s app would for the most part. Painless. Simple. Easy (hint: also like your mom). And what makes it more perfect is that the process doesn’t differ between using Windows or Linux, so if you’re transitioning, it’d be completely familiar to you.

Which is why I ask the question: could this be part of the key to really mainstreaming Linux? It has always been my opinion that application installation has been the single largest barrier to entry Linux has faced in the general market. If this concept could be passed along to general application installation (like an RPM, only better), I think things would change rapidly. Naturally, that’s just my opinion. But it does make the OS and AIR based applications immediately useful, without any guessing, and that’s really what the install.exe-bred users need to smooth a transition to a new and foreign OS.

The great part about today’s blog, is that the people most likely to read through it won’t get much out of it because it’s all old news, and the people that would benefit the most probably will skip it because usually my tech blogs aren’t so entertaining. So, if my tech stuff normally doesn’t interest you, take the time to read this one. The rest of you, read it anyway. You owe me. You know why.

I’ve been thinking a lot more about the social web lately. Hopefully, it’s been thinking about me too (Why won’t you return my calls?!). My experiment with operating solely through NetVibes was neither a success or failure. You could call it a “failcess.” Some things worked, some didn’t, which I think is to be expected. After all, Facebook doesn’t want to reveal their whole system through their API (Application Program Interface), since they want you to keep going to their actual site so they can show you ads. Heck, MySpace hasn’t even opened an API for use (shame on you MySpace, you’re in danger of becoming the next Netscape as it is). So as a social web consumer, there’s really only so much that you can do effectively. As a social information provider, however, that’s a different story.

How many sites do you have accounts on? MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Youtube, Digg, Hi5, Beebo, Flickr, LiveJournal, Technorati, Last.FM…? This list can go on and on. The great part is that there are sites making a good effort to help you centralize ownership of your web identity. SocialThing, Profilactic, FriendFeed, Tumblr, and plenty of others. The best part is, not only do these sites help you mashup feeds and information from friends, they can help you take some ownership over your own identity (they know how to make a mean chocolate shake too). More than any other time, potential employers and clients are doing background checks on you through things like Google. Imagine for a moment your name was John Wilson. Are you confident all the hits would be right if someone was looking for you? Turns out, John Wilson is not an uncommon name. Wouldn’t it be nice if you could send someone somewhere, where you maintain (the appearance of) full disclosure, and can provide correct, confident links to sites about you?

First step, buy your name as a domain. Vanity domains are becoming increasingly popular (and occasionally sexy), and can be valuable as a tool in promoting yourself professionally (I’m looking at you, Midwest Melissa). It also keeps someone from trying to be a fake you, like your evil, goateed twin that keeps trying to take your place. Suck it up and spend the $7.95 to register it, then spend a few more bucks either on hosting or point it at a blog or whatnot. Step two, I mentioned Profilactic, which is what I am using here to handle my social identity control. Granted this domain is not a vanity name, but it’s still the one I send people to. On the sidebar, I created a section called “My Stuff” and plugged in the code Profilactic gives you:

Now, I have an instant gateway to my sites, and my visitors can be confident that anyone else out there with my name can be distinguished from me-me. Not only that, but it also creates a convenient way for me to get to my own stuff as well. In effect, what you are creating is your own social portal type of page. A page that becomes a central repository of links and gateways to the things you want people to identify with you (you might leave AdultFriendFinder off that list, just a suggestion). Providing a resource like that will also discourage people from looking elsewhere. If you have two MySpace pages, one nice and professional, and one that you made three years ago that you forgot the password to where you have…sexy pictures…having this kind of portal you can preempt a search and send someone to the current page.

Hopefully you see the obvious value this would create to you as a web site consumer. Centralization is the big thing now. Finding ways to simplify and streamline access to your data, wherever it might be located. Having your own site also opens up additional centralized solutions, like using your own blog/site URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) as an OpenID login (I recommend MyVidoop as a provider). Not everyone is on the OpenID train yet, but it’s growing fast. It never hurts to have options like this available to you should you want to leverage them, and it all starts with taking control of your identity. Know the size of your digital footprint. It’s easy to forget just how much stuff you put out there and make available. It’s also easy for it to get out of date. The better job you do controlling it all, the better you ultimately serve yourself.